Difference between revisions of "Frame Designs"

From HiveTool
Jump to: navigation, search
(Designs)
(Designs)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
<gallery mode="Packed" widths=250px>
 
<gallery mode="Packed" widths=250px>
 
File:Chesick4.jpg
 
File:Chesick4.jpg
 +
File:20150224 214129.jpg
 +
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>

Revision as of 04:40, 17 March 2017

Goals

Two different designs:

  1. A low cost load cell mounting system for 1, 2 or 4 load cells for a mass produced and sold as a consumer product.
  2. A load cell mounting system that can be built from readily available materials by students using tools found in a home shop.
  • light weight
  • durable (won't rust, rot, or become brittle)
  • overload limit
  • protect load cells from uneven heating
  • enclose electronics and conceal or protect wires.


Many interesting and innovative designs have been suggested, built and tested.

Designs

Several frames have been designed, each with advantages and disadvantages:

  1. Punched and bent
  2. Welded Steel Rectangular Tubing
  3. Progressive die stamped and welded
  4. Unistrut/SuperStrut
  5. 3D printed corner brackets/metal tubing
  6. Frameless (2 rails) using strut
  7. Octanorm aluminum extrusion with torx cam locks
  8. Vacuum Forming: A Plastic/Aluminum Hybrid Frame
  9. Ultimate Bottom Board: Utilizing a Manufactured Frame with Aluminum Undercarrage
  10. Thrifty-Bee Scale: A Low-Cost All Aluminum Scale